Cloud Atlas
Next on my "books what I read" list is David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas, a recommendation of my friend Nick, whose taste is very very good. Or at least very similar to mine, which may not be the same thing.
Cloud Atlas is a collection of 6 stories, 5 of which are interrupted halfway through by the next. The hero of story B will find that his manuscript of story A was incomplete and so on. After the sixth story is told in full, the one which preceded it resumes, creating a mirror image until we finish with the second half of the opening story.
The idea is that the characters in all of the stories are in some way connected, although their historical settings range from the 19th century to thousands of years in the future. Many of them are revealed to have a birthmark in the shape of a comet. The youthful addressee of a series of letters in one story has grown into an aged nuclear scientist in the next. A deviant mutant in one story has evolved into a deity thousands of years later.
Most of the stories are set in genres of their own - we have a historical yarn fighting for space with a political thriller and pure science fiction, and each is beautifully written, although all the chopping and changing reminded me a little of Italo Calvino's "If on a winter's night a traveller".
I did wish that the connections between the stories had been a little sounder. They seemed at times to be crowbarred in and only once or twice did they create the "gosh, it's a small world" sensation which can be so satisfying in novels which tell more than one story.
It also seemed a shame that, given that Mitchell was clearly intent on skipping a couple of centuries (at least) each time he started a new story, he chose the nineteenth century as a starting point. The inevitable result was to take him into the future and the world of science fiction which is less appealing to me than a good historical novel - something Mitchell is clearly capable of writing.
Having said that, if you take both of those points to their logical conclusion, where do you end up?
Cloud Atlas is a collection of 6 stories, 5 of which are interrupted halfway through by the next. The hero of story B will find that his manuscript of story A was incomplete and so on. After the sixth story is told in full, the one which preceded it resumes, creating a mirror image until we finish with the second half of the opening story.
The idea is that the characters in all of the stories are in some way connected, although their historical settings range from the 19th century to thousands of years in the future. Many of them are revealed to have a birthmark in the shape of a comet. The youthful addressee of a series of letters in one story has grown into an aged nuclear scientist in the next. A deviant mutant in one story has evolved into a deity thousands of years later.
Most of the stories are set in genres of their own - we have a historical yarn fighting for space with a political thriller and pure science fiction, and each is beautifully written, although all the chopping and changing reminded me a little of Italo Calvino's "If on a winter's night a traveller".
I did wish that the connections between the stories had been a little sounder. They seemed at times to be crowbarred in and only once or twice did they create the "gosh, it's a small world" sensation which can be so satisfying in novels which tell more than one story.
It also seemed a shame that, given that Mitchell was clearly intent on skipping a couple of centuries (at least) each time he started a new story, he chose the nineteenth century as a starting point. The inevitable result was to take him into the future and the world of science fiction which is less appealing to me than a good historical novel - something Mitchell is clearly capable of writing.
Having said that, if you take both of those points to their logical conclusion, where do you end up?

